Landmark’s takeover plans for farm services rival, Ruralco, don’t include painting it all green or changing the junior player’s diverse network of agency and merchandise businesses.
Although big green Landmark’s $469 million buyout plan does involve moving Ruralco head office activities from Sydney to Melbourne, plus significant savings from integrating management and business processes, any changes in the bush will be minimal.
“In this game we’re only as good as the people on the ground and Ruralco has a lot of good people on the ground, so we don’t want to change things,” said Landmark managing director, Rob Clayton.
We’re certainly not buying Ruralco because we think it’s broken and needs fixing
“It is also doing a lot of good stuff.
"We’re certainly not buying Ruralco because we think it’s broken and needs fixing.”
Mr Clayton also planned to be talking directly to Ruralco’s many joint venture partners within a fortnight to allay any of their fears.
A big portion of those JVs include selling agents and partners in the Combined Rural Traders farm supplies network, or independent CRT business owners buying from Ruralco’s wholesaling division.
Ruralco managing director, Travis Dillon, said feedback he had received since confirming the merger mid last week had been “overwhelmingly positive”.
Regardless, for the next six months, at least, both companies would remain active business rivals, although Ruralco has urged its shareholders to support the $4.40 a share bid from Landmark and its big Canadian parent, Nutrien.
“We’re very much competitors until the transaction is completed - which could take quite a while given the various approvals required,” Mr Dillon said.
Both bosses were also adamant the merger would not reduce competition in the agricultural supplies, markets or agency sectors.
Many smaller operators and new entrants were emerging all the time.
“Our marketplace is more competitive with new suppliers and players every day,” said Mr Clayton, who began planning Landmark’s bid for Ruralco soon after taking on his top job 13 months ago.
I doubt the regulators or customers will have a problem with three big players consolidating down to two
“We see product suppliers going direct to farmers, plus online competitors starting up, and a rise in mum and dad agency and service operators.
“In fact, half our marketplace is estimated to be made up of independents.
“Several large agency groups and merchandise networks already look and act like corporates.
“I doubt the regulators or customers will have a problem with three big players consolidating down to two.”
Respecting Ruralco brands
Mr Clayton is, however, conscious of “doing the right thing for the local market”, acknowledging different farm sector communities have different expectations of their various Ruralco brands.
“The CRT brand definitely stays, even though Landmark has its own similar wholesaling business supplying our own stores and independents,” he said.
“We think our experience and capacity will add value to CRT franchises.
This merger is not going to be about Landmarking everything our way
“I’m asking franchise owners to give us a go, but if some CRT members want to put up a new sign with another supplier group we’ll have to accept that.
“I want to be very respectful of the many different brands and joint ventures which make Ruralco successful in its local markets.
“This merger is not going to be about Landmarking everything our way.”
He said even some of Landmark’s own businesses retained their original brand identity, including NSW-Victorian border agency, Paull and Scollard, which joined the corporate’s fold last year.
Ruralco chairman, Rick Lee, also believed Landmark's agenda recognised the success of his company’s existing strategy and "future growth potential in the businesses”.
Located across 500 business sites, Ruralco's portfolio ranges from traditional stock and property agencies to merchandise sales, wool broking, livestock exports, finance and insurance services, grain trading, water broking, water equipment retailing and irrigation project design.
Its brands and partnerships include Agfarm, Mecardo, Total Eden, Frontier, Assure, CRT, Roberts, Primaries, Dairy Livestock Services, Rawlinson and Brown, CQ Ag Services, Queensland Rural, Rodwells and AgriWest.
Ruralco is not in a weak position. We’ve performed very well despite the drought
Originally a Tasmanian-based agency network built around the 155-year-old Roberts business, its real growth as a national company began after Roberts and CRT’s diversifying parent, Ruralco, merged in 2006.
It now has about 2000 staff, equivalent to Landmark, which has about 200 corporate-owned stores and about 50 Landmark franchise sites.
- Ruralco accepts Nutrien's $470m overture
- Landmark on the prowl
- Local `bloke' no more at new-age Ruralco
Ruralco boss for the past four years, Mr Dillon, will lose his own job if the merger goes ahead as expected.
However, he said Landmark’s backing from its parent company, the North American fertiliser and farm chemical supplies giant, Nutrien, would be "a positive" for services to Ruralco customers.
“It’s about more than just the back end business efficiencies cutting service delivery costs,” he said.
“Nutrien is a $40 billion business and the global leader in farm input services, which means the technical and investment opportunities and potential for staff advancement are far greater than a $300m Ruralco can expect to match.”
Sale not drought-related
Mr Dillon rejected suggestions Landmark/Nutrien timed the bid to take advantage of Ruralco’s drought-weakened market strength.
“Ruralco is not in a weak position. We’ve performed very well despite the drought - we had a record result last year.”
“This is not a drought related acquisition.
"They see good value in Ruralco and having it as part of the Landmark offering.”
The deal on the table is very good. A counter offer is up to others to assess, but obviously could be considered
He was unsure if the move would prompt a counter bid from the likes of Elders, but said shareholders had so far been strongly supportive of Nutrien offer’s at a 44 per cent premium on Ruralco’s share price of early last week.
“The deal on the table is very good. A counter offer is up to others to assess, but obviously could be considered.”
Regulatory approval will be required from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and the Foreign Investment Review Board, all of which is not expected to be finalised until the second half of this year.
Mr Clayton said the farm services marketplace was so competitive already, with few entry barriers to new players, he did not believe competition regulators would require Landmark to divest some assets.
In fact, he said unlike many new players, Landmark’s priority was to maintain and support “bricks and mortar” facilities to service the agricultural market, complementing fast emerging online services, including its own digital platforms.