Pork ponders feed efficiency failings

Pork industry ponders feed efficiency failings

Agribusiness
PORK CHALLENGE :CRC for High Integrity Australian Pork chief executive officer Roger Campbell says Australia is less efficient than its global competitors because of higher costs, other than feed.

PORK CHALLENGE :CRC for High Integrity Australian Pork chief executive officer Roger Campbell says Australia is less efficient than its global competitors because of higher costs, other than feed.

Aa

Australia pork industry is less efficient than its global competitors because of higher costs, other than feed.

Aa

AUSTRALIAN pork producers are making good progress in reproduction and are matching their overseas competitors for herd feed efficiency, but they come a long way last in volume, or kilogram carcass weight sold per sow, per year.

CRC for High Integrity Australian Pork chief executive officer Roger Campbell said the outcome reflected in Australia’s much higher costs, other than feed, than our global competitors.

“This must be addressed through better sow productivity and potentially heavier carcass weights,” he said.

Dr Campbell acknowledged that the issue of heavier weights was market driven and largely up to individual businesses working with their customers.

We need to determine the major factors robbing us of feed efficiency in commercial herds. - Dr Roger Campbell

While Pork CRC research had positively impacted born alive and number weaned, he expected further enhancements through Australasian Pork Research Institute Limited (APRIL), which had now called for research proposals to markedly enhance the competiveness and sustainability of the Australasian pork industry.

That APRIL call closes February 16, with successful projects expected to begin July 1.

Dr Campbell said Australian pork producers were competitive for feed efficiency, but it was a key performance indicator that unfortunately had remained static for some time and was well below the capability of available genetics.

For example, the average feed: gain between weaning and sale for producers in Pork CRC’s benchmarking project was 2.4 The desired target was 2.0 from wean to sale.

In a commercial study on grind size (Pork CRC Project 4B-121), nutritionist Tony Edwards reported an average feed: gain of 2.38 across three studies, using female pigs between 38kg and 97kg.

In earlier work on lysine requirements of modern genotypes at WA’s Medina Research Station, Dr Bruce Mullan and his DAFWA colleagues reported feed: gain values for 50kg to 100kg group housed female and male pigs of 2.55 and 2.25 respectively.

“Recognising we are missing out on a lot of the pig’s potential, we need to determine the major factors robbing us of feed efficiency in commercial herds,” Dr Campbell said.

“That could be what’s fed and how it’s fed, or pigs per unit of air space.”

The story Pork ponders feed efficiency failings first appeared on Queensland Country Life.

Aa

From the front page

Sponsored by