Palm oil labelling bill risks alienating Malaysia

23 Jun, 2011 08:58 AM

A BRAWL over food labelling for products containing palm oil threatens to test Australia's relationship with major palm oil producer Malaysia, which has offered to take some of Australia's asylum seekers.

Proposed legislation to introduce mandatory labelling of palm oil in food products is expected to be passed in the Senate today after securing crucial Coalition support. It was sponsored by the Greens and independent senator Nick Xenophon, reports The Australian Financial Review .

Environmental and health groups have campaigned for the labelling, citing that palm oil is unhealthy and that its plantations have displaced native forests in Malaysia and Indonesia, destroying the habitat of orang-utans.

Palm oil is labelled as "vegetable oil" even though it is a fruit plant and contains 50 per cent saturated fat, many times more saturated fat than found in other vegetable oils, according to Senator Xenophon.

"Australians consume 10 kilograms of palm oil every year and don't know it," Senator Xenophon said.

The South Australian said he was "quietly confident" the bill would pass the House of Representatives with the support of fellow independents Andrew Wilkie and Bob Katter.

But trade experts warn that if the proposed legislation becomes law, Australia's relationship with Malaysia could be harmed at a time Prime Minister Julia Gillard is trying to complete her asylum seeker deal with Malaysia.

Palm oil is Malaysia's biggest export and its production supports more than 500,000 workers.

The Malaysian government says the "truth in labelling" could cause economic harm to low-income workers.

The Australian Food and Grocery Council also opposed the proposed labelling laws because it circumvented the rights of states and territories and there were doubts that it could ever be enforced.

The Australian Financial ReviewSource:
Date: Newest first | Oldest first


23/06/2011 11:53:49 AM

The fact that palm oil is only planted on 0.22% of the world's agricultural land and yet produce 30% of the world's supply of edible oil should have clued in Aussie politicians that something doesn't jive with Xenophon's palm oil deforestation hype! Malaysia had been the world's largest producer of palm oil for more than a century. Yet after cultivating palm oil for more than a hundred years, Malaysia has still retained forest cover in excess of 52%. In Indonesia, palm oil cultivation currently only occupies 6% of the country's land mass. So much for looney Xenophon's scare mongering!
Ian Mott
23/06/2011 1:00:59 PM

Good post, palmhugger. This was always a smoke screen to hide the fact that Ludwig's trashing of the live cattle trade will put more than a million hectares of Indonesian forest under the axe. The guy didn't even present a written submission to Cabinet on the impact of the ban, let alone present a properly researched options paper. And as always, there is an independent politician waiting to distract attention with his pathetic vaudeville stunts. Can any of these clowns think further ahead than 2 moves on a chess board?


Screen name *
Email address *
Remember me?
Comment *


light grey arrow
Speaking of opinions, I note the only studies you take seriously WTF are those that support your
light grey arrow
CBH prices for WA GM and non-GM canola delivered to ports are published each week in table and
light grey arrow
The whole basis of your argument is that geneflow does not occur in species that cross